The short version: Nurses rarely leave over pay alone. They leave over rosters that ignore their lives. In a labour market as thin as Tasmania’s, the roster is one of the cheapest retention levers you are not pulling.
When a Tasmanian aged care home loses a registered nurse, the exit interview usually blames pay. Pay matters, and it has risen. But the roster is the quieter and more common reason nurses walk, and unlike a national award rate, it is entirely within your control.
The evidence is close to home. In ANMF Tasmania reporting on one large provider, 77% of respondents said a new master roster had affected their role and 79% said staffing levels had decreased at their workplace. Whatever the provider’s intent, that is what the change felt like to the people delivering care, and people leave over how work feels week to week.
Why rostering drives turnover
A roster is the most concrete signal a nurse receives about whether the organisation respects their time. Late releases make it impossible to plan a life. Last-minute changes erode trust. Quick returns, a late shift followed by an early start, grind people down. And when the same handful of nurses always absorb the nights, burnout is a matter of when, not if.
What good rostering looks like
- Publish rosters well ahead, ideally four weeks or more, so people can plan.
- Honour stated preferences and part-time agreements rather than treating them as suggestions.
- Spread unpopular shifts fairly across the team instead of leaning on the willing few.
- Avoid quick returns and overlong consecutive stretches that guarantee fatigue.
- Consult staff before changing a master roster, not after it lands.
| Costly habit | Better practice |
|---|---|
| Roster released days out | Published four or more weeks ahead |
| Master roster changed unilaterally | Consult, then change |
| Same staff always carry nights | Rotate the night load |
| Long unbroken stretches | Cap consecutive shifts, build in recovery |
Where to start
You do not need a new system to make next month’s roster better than last month’s. Three changes cost almost nothing and signal a great deal.
- Publish the next roster a week earlier than you did last time, then keep extending the lead.
- Ask each nurse for their genuine availability and honour it wherever the floor allows.
- Before you change a master roster, put it to the team and listen to the response.
The business case
Replacing a registered nurse is expensive: recruitment, agency backfill at a premium, and months of onboarding before the new hire is fully productive. Better rostering, by contrast, costs consultation time and decent software. With the 24/7 RN rule making every registered nurse legally load-bearing, losing one to a fixable roster problem is among the most expensive mistakes a Tasmanian home can make.
There is a recruitment dividend too. In a market as connected as Tasmania’s, nurses talk, and a home known for rosters that respect people’s lives becomes a place others want to join. The roster you build to keep your current nurses quietly does your recruiting for you.
A roster published a fortnight late tells a nurse exactly where she sits in your priorities. Most of them are reading it correctly.
If retention is the problem you are actually trying to solve, the roster is the place to start before the pay review. If you would like a second view on where your workforce practices are quietly costing you nurses, that is the kind of question we work through with operators.
If you are a Tasmanian aged care operator trying to hold on to good nurses, Community Health Connect helps with both the hiring and the keeping.
Get in touch